Director Report (Spain)  |
It includes
|
Company registers with activity
| Date | Event | Region |
|---|---|---|
| Friday, February 13, 1998 | Resignation as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Tuesday, December 28, 1999 | Appointment as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Thursday, February 17, 2000 | Appointment as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Monday, February 11, 2002 | Re-election as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Wednesday, December 18, 2002 | Appointment as Alternate Auditor 2 | Badajoz |
| Wednesday, December 10, 2003 | Re-election as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Tuesday, March 16, 2004 | Appointment as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Wednesday, January 26, 2005 | Appointment as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Monday, March 21, 2005 | Appointment as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Wednesday, August 16, 2006 | Re-election as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Thursday, January 18, 2007 | Appointment as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Monday, July 2, 2007 | Appointment as Alternate Auditor 2 | Madrid |
| Wednesday, October 24, 2007 | Re-election as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Monday, December 31, 2007 | Appointment as Alternate Auditor 2 | Cáceres |
| Tuesday, December 2, 2008 | Appointment as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Monday, February 2, 2009 | Appointment as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Wednesday, December 23, 2009 | Re-election as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Thursday, January 20, 2011 | Re-election as Alternate Auditor 2 | Badajoz |
| Monday, August 1, 2011 | Re-election as Auditor | Albacete |
| Thursday, October 27, 2011 | Re-election as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Monday, November 14, 2011 | Re-election as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Tuesday, January 10, 2012 | Re-election as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Monday, February 25, 2013 | Resignation as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Tuesday, July 9, 2013 | Resignation as Auditor | Albacete |
| Friday, November 22, 2013 | Resignation as Auditor | Badajoz |
| Monday, June 15, 2015 | Resignation as Auditor | Badajoz |
This information comes from public records and it's show in accordance to Article 6.1 of the GDPR. The individual's tenure in the mentioned positions may vary. Matching is performed only by full name so it's possible that the information refers to more than one person.
